Question
Mr. Chan earned salary of $480,000 and contributed $20,000 to Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) retirement scheme in the year of assessment (YA) 2015/16. Mr. Chan
Mr. Chan earned salary of $480,000 and contributed $20,000 to Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) retirement scheme in the year of assessment (YA) 2015/16. Mr. Chan signed a lease agreement with a tenant for two years starting from 1 April 2015. According to the lease agreement, he let his sole-owned property in Yuen Long to the tenant at $30,000 per month payable on the first day of each month commencing on 1 April 2015. He also received refundable rental deposit worth two months' rent from the tenant on 1 April 2015. According to the terms of the lease, Mr. Chan, as the landlord, would be responsible for rates, management fees, and all related expenses such as maintenance and repairs of the rental property. For the period from April 2015 to March 2016, Mr. Chan paid rates of $12,000 and mortgage interests of $20,000 in relation to the rental property. Due to a plumbing problem in the property, Mr. Chan paid $10,000 in related repairs. Mr. Chan used to have a consulting business as a sole proprietor but the business incurred a loss. Therefore, he ceased the business in the YA 2014/15 and still had an excess loss carried forward of $5,000. Required: Would it be more advantageous, when only considering tax payable, for Mr. Chan to elect personal assessment (PA) for the YA 2015/16? Please indicate your answer precisely. Support your advice with computation of Mr. Chan's tax payable in a good (logical and understandable) format. Disregard rates concession, tax reduction and provisional tax. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started