Mrs. Jones independently runs an sole proprietorship called "Holistic Vision Improvement, through which she provides acupunctures services, claiming that very carefully-placed needles in the eyelids of persons who need glasses due to aging will improve and in some cases completely cure fading vision. However, when placing needles in the eyelid of Mr. Borg, a strong believer in unorthodox cures, Mrs. Jones makes a slight miscalculation piercing Mr. Borg's eyeball and causing complete blindness in one eye. Mr. Borg sued for damages, but Mrs. Jones insists his remedy Is limited to the assets of "Holistic Vision Improvement", of which there are few Comment on the validity of argument and Mrs. Jones argument. Who will be successful?