Much of the work on personality theories has been approached from a homogenous perspective; often by highly educated male researchers from the US or UK, using English language terminology. In addition, many of the samples used to test personality theories are drawn from populations across similar Western countries.

Answer this- How do you think that researchers from different backgrounds might have thought about personality differently, and what are the implications of this for understanding personality (consider, for example, possible cultural differences)?

Give references please.