Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Multiple Choice O No, according to the doctrine of privity of contract. O No, according to the parol evidence rule. O Yes, this is a
Multiple Choice O No, according to the doctrine of privity of contract. O No, according to the parol evidence rule. O Yes, this is a statutory novation. O Yes, according to the Statute of Frauds. O Yes, according to the doctrine of promissory estoppel.Evan enters into a contract with Right Construction Ltd. for the construction ofa wine cellar. The house is open concept and Evan wants the wine cellar accessible from the kitchen. Access from the kitchen was not provided as agreed in the contract. Evan sues Right Construction Ltd. seeking $100,000 in damages. He is successful, but discovers that Right Construction Ltd. does not have assets to satisfy thejudgment as it regularly transfers its assets to its parent company Allright Company Inc. Can Mr. Black collect the $100000 from Ailright Holding Company Inc. Multiple Choice 0 No, according to the doctrine of priVIty of contract. No, according to the parol evidence rule. Yes. according to the Statute of Frauds. 0 Yes, this is a statutory novation
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started