Multiple choice question on commercial law (UCC)

Question #17 (worth 1 point)

In July, Buyer, a local market owner, enters into a valid contract with seller, a maple syrup farmer, whereby seller is to sell his entire crop of syrup to buyer for $15,000. There are no special characteristics about the seller's product differentiating it.

Later, a syrup manufacturer approached seller and offered him $16,500 for his entire crop to meet the manufacturer's increased demands around Labor Day. Although he already promised the crop to Buyer, seller found the deal too good to pass up and accepted the manufacturer's offer. Buyer sued for specific performance,

while the maple syrup was still in the seller's possession. Buyer was able to schedule an expedited hearing on his specific performance request and the matter was promptly heard. Page 11 of 18 At the hearing seeking specific performance, the Buyer should:

(A) Prevail, because specific performance is generally available under UCC.

(B) Prevail, because future contracts are subject to specific performance under the UCC.

(C) Lose, because buyer can be adequately compensated by cover or market differential damages.

(D) Lose, because specific performance is not available in anticipatory repudiation cases