Multiple Choice. Since consequentialism judges an action based upon the expected results to Review Later determine whether it is morally right or wrong, a morally permissible action a morally unjustified action and depends upon agreement within an ethical movement or community, is dependent upon the ethics of the individual actor is mitigated by the circumstances surrounding the action; is mitigated by the character of the actor brings about the most happiness or good; is characterized by bad effects that outweigh the good effects and bring the least amount of happiness works in favor of social justice: is one that prevents autonomous decision-making Multiple Choice. As in the case of Rebecca Bredow, the mother refusing to vaccinate her child, Review Later which ethical principles or actions conflict and oftentimes conflict in child vaccination cases? virtue ethics' expectation of all individuals to act in a morally justified way that reflects moral character and professionals' duties to conscientiously object to and refuse to follow immoral court orders Beneficence of the refusing mother who attempts to do good for her child by not vaccinating as well as distributive justice of resources since this choice is only available to more privileged parents. a doctor's obligation to adhere to nonmaleficence and do no harm and a doctor's prerogative to conscientiously object Parental rights for autonomous decision-making, on behalf of their children, conflict with accomplishing the most good for the most people