n Canada v Taino, the Immigration Division considered whether the continuing detention of a permanent resident who could not be deported would violate his Charter rights. What rights were engaged? Question 5 options: A) Section 9 - because his unlawful detention was arbitrary B) Section 15 - because his rights to equality were breached C) Section 7 - because section 248 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations breached his right to liberty D) Sections 7 and 9 because Mr. Taino's ongoing detention breached his right to liberty and was arbitrary