Nalini wants to lose some weight. She sees a half page advertisement for a weight loss program by Perfect Body Pty Ltd (Perfect Body) that suits her because it mentions gluten free meals, and Nalini cannot eat gluten. The advertisement reads: "Lose up to 10 kgs of weight for $10 program fee including all meals! Gluten free options available." In small print at the bottom of the advertisement are the words "Special meal requests will incur additional cost". In the centre of the advertisement is a photo of Paris Holly, a famous model, and referred to as "one of the program's ambassadors". Nalini is excited and visits Perfect Body's shop to sign up for the program. To her disappointment, after signing up the weight loss program, she finds out that she must pay extra for the meals (at a minimum cost of $300 per week even for standard meals), and that not all meals in the program have a gluten-free option. Nalini also discovers from reliable sources that Paris Holly is in fact, not an ambassador of the program

Can Perfect Body Pty Ltd argue that they had no intention to mislead Nalini, because Nalini should have read the small print at the bottom of the advertisement?