Nate sues Bob and Tom for negligence. The jury determines Nate suffered $20,000 in damages. The jury determines that the responsibility for Nate's injury was as follows: Nate: 0%; Bob: 40%; and Tom: 60%. The jury also found that, although there were no verbal or written warnings, Nate was nonetheless aware of and accepted the risks created by Bob and Tom before engaging in the activity that injured him. Which statement is correct?

A. Under pure comparative negligence, Nate can recover $8,000 from Bob and $12,000 from Tom B. Under contributory negligence, Nate can recover $0 from Tom and $12,000 from Bob C. Under mixed comparative fault, Nate can recover $0 from Bob and $12,000 from Tom D. Under mixed comparative negligence, Nate can recover $0 from Bob and $12,000 from Tom