need a good and long answer please, thank you!

A Question of Futility: Baby K, 832 F. Supp. 1022 (E.D. Va. 1993) In this case, the infant girl was born with the congenital malformation anencephaly that left STUDY only her brain-stem functioning. The limited function allowed for a continuation of breathing but the infant was permanently unconscious; she could not see or interact with her environ- ment. At birth the physicians and institutional ethics committee had advised the mother that the ventilator had been put in place awaiting a firm diagnosis. But given the child's progno- sis its continued use was futile, and it should be removed. The mother disagreed, and several other hospitals were contacted to see if the baby could be transferred. All refused, and finally the child was transferred to a nursing home. 'LEGAL On several occasions the child was readmitted to the hospital through the emergency room and given ventilator support. The hospital attempted to resist these admissions, but the court held they must provide the services. The court determined that to refuse care to the infant would be in violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTAL the Americans with Disabilities ACT (ADA), and parental decision-making rights as guard teed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.22 1. How would you resolve this dilemma? 2. How would you define futility? How does the child fit in your definition? 3. Review the EMTALA statute and explain why the courts used it to cover this case