Need each to be explained rule of law, relevant facts and conclusion

Instructions For Homework 3, please answer the following two questions: Question #1 - Patent Infringement - John and Andrew Doney invented a hard- bearing device for balancing rotors. Although they obtained a patent for their invention from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, it was never used as an automobile wheel balancer. Sometime later, Exetron Corp. produced an automobile wheel balancer that used a hard-bearing device similar to the Doneys' device. Given that the Doneys had not used their device for automobile wheel balancing, does Exetron's use of a similar device infringe on the Doneys' patent? (See Patents.) Question #2 - Fair Use - Professor Wise is teaching a summer seminar in business torts at State University. Several times during the course, he makes copies of relevant sections from business law texts and distributes them to his students. Wise does not realize that the daughter of one of the textbook authors is a member of his seminar. She tells her father about Wise's copying activities, which have taken place without her father's or his publisher's permission. Her father sues Wise for copyright infringement. Wise claims protection under the fair use doctrine. Who will prevail? Explain. (See Copyrights.) Note: Responses must be fully developed (more than a sentence or two long) and that spelling and grammar are correct. Also, it is essential that you properly identify, define and discuss any relevant legal definitions or rule of law from the text. Then make sure to apply and analyze the particular facts of the homework question in context with the legal definition or rule of law you have identified in order to complete the proper legal analysis. Demonstrating how the law applies to the facts of the question is essential for legal analysis. Finally, make sure that any final conclusion which you have reasoned is clearly illustrated and note how and why you came to your conclusion based on the law and facts you considered