Need help, Please proof read paraphrase the following, with clear sentence structure. does not have to be in the same order as long as it flows and makes sense.

It has come to the attention of Electropic LLC that June Pyle, a long-term employee and one who was recently accepted a promotion within the company, has been less than forthcoming about her educational credentials. Melissa Aldredge is another employee with the company who was also considered for the senior project manager position. She made Electropic LLC aware of June's lack of education.Although the required education has not been completed, June remains an asset to Electropic LLC. In order for the Human Resource Department to determine how to proceed with this situation, they need to find out how this can be resolved ethically and within the guidelines of the law.

Professor Joseph Badaracco presents the theory of "right versus right". This is the notion that an ethical dilemma could result in multiple "right" responses (University of Maryland University College, 2019a). Management and the Human Resource Department need to look beyond the set ethical decision-making rules they rely on and consider that more than two options can be the right choice. June Pyle committed (resume) fraud, or misrepresentation. This is broad legal concept, which incorporates a variety of fraud and misrepresentation, both civil and criminal (University of Maryland University College, 2019b).

Electropic LLC should not terminate June Plye, that decision would not only be a disservice to her personally but would also hurt the company as well. June has a history of excellent work performance and has garnered increased revenue and positive press for the company. Electropic LLC runs the risk of losing that without Junes input. Provisions need to be placed so that if other employees are in the position of nothaving a degree, they are given an allotted time to complete it. Permitting June to remain employed would allow a standard to be set within the company.Anyone employed by Electropic LLC longer than 10 years need to have their transcripts reviewed to ensure that this situation does not to occur again or they would need to be considered for promotions without meeting the educational requirements would be a remedy to this situation.

Professor Badaracco also ask the question "which individuals and which groups have rights we cannot violate" (Badaracco, 2002). June represents the individual and Electropic LLC. the group in this case. There are federal laws in place to protect the rights of the individual employees in an organization. These protections include: the right to be free from harassment and discrimination, the right to a safe workplace, the right to be free from retaliation (also known as whistleblower rights) and the right to fair wages for work performed (Cushway, 2017). If June remains employed with Electropic LLC., she is protected and cannot face retaliation for the academic fraud she committed.

Electropic LLC. also has rights as a group. Group rights are conceived as "their" right rather than "its" right (Jones, 1999). Group rights and individual rights can co-exist in some cases but it is more than likely that the relationship will be mutually supportive (McDonald, 1998). The line that cannot be crossed for the group is violating each individual's right within the group. There are also moral and legal aspects the group must adhere. Placing a policy of reviewing all claims of education will help keep the group honest and prevent situations such as the one June is facing from occurring again.Melissa Aldredge must also be protected from retaliation for being a whistle blower.

There is a way that Electropic LLC can make this situation work for both the betterment of the group and for June Pyle. If June is permitted to stay under the condition that she officially obtain her degree, she would still be able to positively contribute to the success of Electropic LLC. The company would benefit from her expertise in the field and the additional revenue and positive attention she is able to generate. Electropic does not owe Melissa Aldredge an explanation if they decide to keep June on as the senior project manager. If Electropic is operating in an at will state, June is an at will employee.Employment at will is a doctrine of common law that allows either the employee or the employer to terminate an employment relationship at any time, for any reason, with or without notice, and even for a morally reprehensible reason, so long as the ending of the relationship does not fall into an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine (University of Maryland University College, 2019c). Management could decide to terminate June for the misrepresentation she committed. This option would allow Melissa Aldredge the opportunity to be a candidate for the senior project manager position.

Professor Badaracco suggest that while considering the framework for a decision, three questions should be addressed. The first is the newspaper test: what plan will work best if published on the front page (of the newspaper). Electropic would look like a company that cares a greatly about their employees allowing June Pyle to remain employed and to finish her degree. This is the type of company people would like to work for and it would seem that they are not only concerned about making a profit but helping people get ahead in life. The second test question is to walk a mile in someone else's shoes, or live by the golden rule of "doing to others what you would want done to you". From the long-term view, the best way to handle this is to find a solution that is both ethically and legally permitted. June staying with Electropic LLC is the beneficial thing for her and the company alike. The final test Professor Badaracco suggest be performed is the obituary or best friend test. This acts as a way of reflecting back on the decision that was made if it were reviewed in obituary. How would the best friends of the decision makers at Electropic LLC. feel if they were to read about their choice in an obituary? They would be able to be proud of their decision allowing June to stay. An obituary could be written fondly of how the people in charge of making decision for Electropic LLC did things to benefit their employees and not only to bottom line for the company.

In conclusion, the "right versus right' theory is an important concept to consider in many cases. Employees and employers may be faced with the difficult decision to on how to proceed with an option that should be ethically and legally just. By considering all consequences, rights (individual and group), character and is the solution practical, all the bases of the decision making process are able to be carefully covered. The three test Professor Badaracco provide a way that will allow whatever decision is made to reflect positively on the company.