Need some assistance with Section IV-not sure how to analyze based on the HealthSouth fraud example

ACC 692 Part I Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Part I of the final project is a case analysis in which you will analyze the HealthSouth case in terms of fraud theory and discuss social, legal, and ethical aspects of a fraud investigation. Specifically, you will explain what fraud was committed, who perpetrated the fraud and why, how the fraud was able to occur, and the time span of the fraud. Prompt: Submit an analysis of the social and legal frameworks as related to HealthSouth fraud case. Discuss the social impact of the case as well as provide an analysis of court rulings impacting the manner in which interviews are conducted. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: II. IV. Social Framework A. Discuss the culture of the organization in which the fraud occurred. B. How was the company's management impacted by the fraud and the investigation? C. How were the employees of the company impacted by the fraud and the investigation? D. How was the public impacted by this fraud scheme? Legal Framework A. Analyze the impact court rulings have on the manner in which the interviews were conducted. Include the following in your response: 1. Miranda 2. Daubert 3. Weingarten 4. Fourth Amendment B. Discuss the fraud case in terms of adjudicating the case civilly. What is the role of the fraud investigator? C. Discuss the fraud case in terms of criminal prosecution. What is the role of the fraud investigator? Guidelines for Submission: Your case analysis must be submitted as a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Social Framework: Culture Proficient (100%) Discusses the culture of the organization in which the fraud occurred Needs Improvement (75%) Discusses the culture of the organization in which the fraud occurred, but discussion is cursory or contains inaccuracies Not Evident (0%) Does not discuss the culture of the organization in which the fraud occurred Value 13 Social Framework: Company's Management Impacted Explains how the company's management was impacted by the fraud and investigation Social Framework: Employees Impacted Explains how the employees were impacted by the fraud and investigation Social Framework: Public Impacted Explains how the public was impacted by the fraud scheme Legal Framework: Court Rulings Analyzes the impact court rulings have on the manner in which interviews were conducted, including Miranda, Daubert, Weingarten, and the Fourth Amendment Legal Framework: Adjudicating Civilly Discusses the fraud case in terms of adjudicating the case civilly and the role of the fraud investigator Legal Framework: Criminal Prosecution Discusses the fraud case in terms of criminal prosecution and the role of the fraud investigator Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Explains how the company's management was impacted by the fraud and investigation, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Explains how the employees were impacted by the fraud and investigation, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Explains how the public was impacted by the fraud scheme, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Analyzes the impact court rulings have on the manner in which interviews were conducted, including Miranda, Daubert, Weingarten, and the Fourth Amendment, but analysis is cursory or contains inaccuracies Discusses the fraud case in terms of adjudicating the case civilly but does not discuss the role of the fraud investigator, or discussion is cursory or contains inaccuracies Discusses the fraud case in terms of criminal prosecution but does not discuss the role of the fraud investigator, or discussion is cursory or contains inaccuracies Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not explain how the company's management was impacted by the fraud and investigation 13 Does not explain how the employees were impacted by the fraud and investigation 13 Does not discuss how the public was impacted by the fraud scheme 13 Does not analyze the impact court rulings have on the matter in which interviews were conducted 13 Does not discuss the fraud case in terms of adjudicating the case civilly 13 Does not discuss the fraud case in terms of criminal prosecution 13 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Total 9 100%