need Whole by Whole comparison for each bulldozer

example:

Canon-D bulldozer

The Canon-D has an excellent pushing capacity that is more than enough for our U.S. construction project. The canon has a pushing capacity of 1300 tons per hour (TPH) over 500 ft. This number is listed in their brochures and are confirmed by recent tests reported in the trade journal, bulldozer Unlimited.

The canon-D has a basic purchase price of $250,000. This purchase comes with complete parts-and-service for 90 days. With additional parts warranty on the drivetrain for another 12 month. There is an option to purchase additional two-year warranty that covers in the drivetrain for an additional $4,000.

This machine is an established commercial bulldozer with a good reputation for reliability in the field . The D model is the latest version of a machine that began with the A model in 1954, so the company has had years to refine its technology. Interestingly, several years ago Cannon decided not to add sealed tacks to its list of features, even though this sealed approach is one of the newest track innovations in the industry. Even so, the Cannon-D generally will operate for 10,000 hours without major maintenance in the tracks. It remains to be seen if the decision about sealed tracks was the correct one.

Second assignment This assignment is adapted from one of the models in the sixth edition of our textbook. This is an example of a "part by part" comparison/contrast. Rewrite as a "whole by whole" comparison/contrast. Reorganize the material into three sections: one for the Canon-D bulldozer, one for the Foley-G bulldozer, and the third for the Koso-L bulldozer. Note that the final three paragraphs can be used individually as written in your "whole by whole" comparison/contrast. PART-BY-PART PATTERN COMPARISON OF BULLDOZERS This is a comparison of the Cannon-D, Foley-G, and Koso-L bulldozers. The major criteria considered are pushing capacity, purchase details, and dependability. Pushing Capacity Both the Cannon-D and Foley-G have an excellent pushing capacity that is more than adequate for our U.S. construction projects. The Cannon has a pushing capacity of 1300 tons per hour (TPH) over 500 ft, whereas the Foley has a pushing capacity of 1100 TPH over 500 ft. Both figures are mentioned in brochures from their respective companies. Furthermore they are confirmed by recent tests reported in the trade journal, Bulldozer Unlimited. The Koso-L, however, lags behind its two competitors, being able to push only 1000 TPH over 500 ft. Furthermore, this figure was found only in the company's sales brochures, with no verification available in the trade journals I researched. Purchase Details The main elements of the purchase price, warranty, and cost of extended warranty-vary considerably among the three machines. The basic purchase prices are as follows: 1. $250,000 for the Cannon-D 2. S300,000 for the Foley-G 3. S310,000 for the Koso-L Concerning warranties, Cannon provides a complete parts-and-service warranty for 90 days, with an additional parts warranty on the drivetrain for another 12 months. Foley offers the same initial parts-and-service warranty, but it has a longer parts warranty on the drivetrain-18 months. Koso has a complete parts-and-service warranty for six months, with no additional parts warranty on the drivetrain. Beyond these warranties that come with the machines, all three companies offer the same option of an additional two-year warranty that covers parts in the drivetrain. This additional warranty must be acquired at time of purchase and costs $4,000 for the Cannon, $4,000 for the Foley and $7,000 for the Koso. Dependability Bulldozer downtime can cost the firm a good deal of money, either in project delays or in the added expense of renting another bulldozer, so dependability is an important criterion in comparing the three models. Although the trade journals I consulted contained no model-by-model comparison of dependability of the three bulldozers, I did find occasional references to features that affect reliability. In