Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

Negligent Tort Liability Looking for help with a couple pages on the following question Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring

Negligent Tort Liability

Looking for help with a couple pages on the following question

Superior Electrical (Superior) was in the business of installing electrical wiring and related components at new construction sites. Because some employees were assigned company vehicles equipped with company tools and materials and were expected to drive those vehicles to the work sites, Superior required all employment applicants to hold a valid driver's license. Employees who were assigned a company vehicle were expected to drive for the company during the workday in order to transport job materials and company tools that were kept on the vehicle to job sites. These employees were expected to take the company issued vehicle home at the end of the work day.

Superior hired Cory Jones as an apprentice electrician. Jones had completed an employment application in which he stated that he had a valid driver's license and had not been cited for any traffic violations. These statements were untrue. His license had been suspended because of numerous traffic violations, including careless driving and driving without a license. Superior did not check on his driving record at the time he was hired because, as an apprentice electrician, he was not being assigned a company vehicle and was not expected to drive for the company during the work day.

About a year after hiring Jones, Superior promoted him to electrician and assigned Jones a company vehicle equipped with a rack for transporting wiring and other materials to and from the work sites. Superior intended that Jones drive during the day for the company and to take the vehicle home after the end of the work day. On a later date, when Jones's work hours had ended and he was driving home in the company vehicle, he collided with two cars. The collision resulted solely from Jones's negligence. Carolyn Carson and her son were severely injured in the collision and they sued Superior. The Carson's alleged two theories of recovery against Superior: respondeat superior and negligent hiring.

  • Identify and discuss the legal elements of negligent hiring.
  • Apply those elements of negligent hiring to the facts given in the case.
  • Analyze whether Superior would be liable for negligent hiring.
  • Identify and discuss the legal elements of respondeat superior.
  • Apply those elements of respondeat superior to the facts given in the case.
  • Analyze whether Superior would be liable on respondeat superior grounds.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Elementary Statistics

Authors: Robert R. Johnson, Patricia J. Kuby

11th Edition

978-053873350, 9781133169321, 538733500, 1133169325, 978-0538733502

Students also viewed these Law questions