Nike appears to have developed different business practices for the different countries it operated in. When it became clear it paid its workers in Pakistan considerably less than its workers elsewhere, and allowed considerably worse working conditions, it was attacked as exploitative and unethical. However, it was not clear if any laws were broken. Moreover, jobs in factories working for Nike were actually highly sought after and this is evidence since Nike was not found guilty of irresponsibility or unethical behaviour. A. Critically explain what behaving responsibly or ethically in real life situations actually means for organizations? Do you think increasing pressure to behave responsibly and ethically is having a great impact upon strategic decision making within organisations? How about \"business is business\"? (Businesses only obligations are toward stakeholders). Critically elaborate and discuss your answers and give examples from on-going organizations. (25 Points) B. The challenges to be seen as acting responsibly and ethically as in complying with laws and regulations is made more complex by a number of complicating factors. Explain these factors and provide actual (real life) examples. (25 Points)