Noah is an extreme sports fanatic and his latest endeavor is sky diving. Noah signs a

contract to take sky diving lessons from R U High, Inc. R U High is a popular company

in Noah's community and it is the only sky diving school in a 50 mile radius of the

community.

At the time he signed the contract with R U High, Noah didn't read it because he was told

by the R U High representative that "it's a standard contract, you don't have to read it."

When Noah asked a couple of questions about the contract, the representative brushed him off and said, "Hey, just sign it, ok?" The contract was a standardized form contract that contained extremely small print that was hard to read. Some of the language in the contract was vague and ambiguous. There was one paragraph that indicated Noah was obligated to pay for 12 months of lessons (at $500 per month x 12 = $6,000) and that he

was giving up his right to go to court to enforce his rights under the contract. However,

the R U High representative did not call Noah's attention to this paragraph and Noah

signed the contract. Noah took six months of lessons from R U High and then quit, stating he couldn't continue to pay. R U High sued Noah for breach of contract, claiming that Noah was liable for the remaining six months of lessons, per the terms of the contract.

What is the IRAC for this case? & spotting the issues pertaining to contractual capacity

and legality.

Thank you for your help