Question
Note: Unless noted we assume the decision variables do not have to be integer. Q1 ~ Q9 Jack, a ring maker, is interested in determining
Note: Unless noted we assume the decision variables do not have to be integer.
Q1 ~ Q9
Jack, a ring maker, is interested in determining which items he should make for the upcoming month. His three most popular selections are a start sapphire cocktail ring, a royal ruby friendship band, and a single diamond placed in a Tiffany setting. These items require various combinations of diamonds, sapphires, rubies, and gold as indicated below.
Unit Selling Price | Material Requirement | ||||
Item | Diamonds | Sapphires | Rubies | Gold (grains) | |
Star Sapphire Ring | 1465 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 160 |
Royal Ruby Band | 1500 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 180 |
Single Tiffany Diamond | 400 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Unit Cost | $250 | $175 | $200 | $.375 | |
Current Stock | 60 | 45 | 50 | 10000 |
Note that the costs and on-hand availability of each raw material are also provided in the table above. Jack estimates that he can sell at most 70 star sapphire rings and at most 40 royal ruby friendship rings in the upcoming month. He is obligated to sell at least 25 Tiffany diamond rings in this time period.
The problem can be formulated to determine the product mix that maximize profit by defining S, R, and T to represent the number of sapphire rings, ruby bands, and Tiffany diamonds, respectively, to make for the upcoming month. The following linear programming results. (Note, we don't require the integer solution in this particular problem)
Max ?S+332.5R+93.75T
Subject to
2S+2R+T 60
S 45
2S+3R 50
160S+180R+150T 10000
S 70
R 40
T 25
S, R, T 0
When the problem is solved using Microsoft Excel, the following Answer Report and Sensitivity Report are obtained.
Target Cell (Max) | ||||||
Cell | Name | Original Value | Final Value | |||
$D$2 | OBJ | 0 | ||||
Adjustable Cells | ||||||
Cell | Name | Original Value | Final Value | |||
$A$2 | S | 0 | 2.5 | |||
$B$2 | R | 0 | 15 | |||
$C$2 | T | 0 | 25 | |||
Constraints | ||||||
Cell | Name | Cell Value | Formula | Status | Slack | |
$D$5 | Diamond Availability | 60 | $D$5<=$E$5 | Binding | 0 | |
$D$6 | Sapphire Availability | 2.5 | $D$6<=$E$6 | Not Binding | 42.5 | |
$D$7 | Ruby Availability | 50 | $D$7<=$E$7 | Binding | 0 | |
$D$8 | Gold Availability | 6850 | $D$8<=$E$8 | Not Binding | 3150 | |
$D$9 | Upper Limit on S | 2.5 | $D$9<=$E$9 | Not Binding | 67.5 | |
$D$10 | Upper Limit on R | 15 | $D$10<=$E$10 | Not Binding | 25 | |
$D$11 | Lower Limit on T | 25 | $D$11>=$E$11 | Binding | 0 |
Adjustable Cells | |||||||
Final | Reduced | Objective | Allowable | Allowable | |||
Cell | Name | Value | Cost | Coefficient | Increase | Decrease | |
$A$2 | S | 2.5 | 2.5 | 45.83333333 | |||
$B$2 | R | 15 | 0 | 332.5 | 68.75 | 2.5 | |
$C$2 | T | 25 | 0 | 93.75 | 68.75 | 1E+30 | |
Constraints | |||||||
Final | Shadow | Constraint | Allowable | Allowable | |||
Cell | Name | Value | Price | R.H. Side | Increase | Decrease | |
$D$5 | Diamond Availability | 60 | 162.5 | 60 | 15 | 1.666666667 | |
$D$6 | Sapphire Availability | 2.5 | 45 | ||||
$D$7 | Ruby Availability | 50 | 2.5 | 50 | 2.5 | 15 | |
$D$8 | Gold Availability | 6850 | 10000 | 1E+30 | 3150 | ||
$D$9 | Upper Limit on S | 2.5 | 0 | 70 | 1E+30 | 67.5 | |
$D$10 | Upper Limit on R | 15 | 0 | 40 | 1E+30 | 25 | |
$D$11 | Lower Limit on T | 25 | -68.75 | 25 | 1.666666667 | 15 |
- What is the reduced cost of S?
a.
The reduced cost is positive because S is at its upper bond.
b.
The reduced cost is zero .
c.
The reduced cost is positive because it is worth while to produce S.
d.
The reduced cost is negative.
Flag question: Question 2
Question 2 5 pts
What is the shadow price of Sapphire?
Group of answer choices
a.
130
b.
it is a positive value and we can use it to calculate the opportunity cost.
c.
it is a negative value.
d.
It is zero since Sapphire availability is a non biding constraint.
Flag question: Question 3
Question 3 5 pts
What is the allowable increase of Sapphire availability?
Group of answer choices
a.
it is infinite since the Sapphire availability is a non-binding constraint.
b.
it is zero since Sapphire availability is a non-binding constraint.
c.
it is a positive number.
d.
We don't know unless we see the excel output.
Flag question: Question 4
Question 4 5 pts
What is the allowable decrease of Sapphire availability?
Group of answer choices
a.
It is zero since the Sapphire availability is a slack constraint.
b.
It is a negative number.
c.
The allowable decrease is the amount of the slack
d.
It is infinite since the Sapphire availability is a slack constraint.
Flag question: Question 5
Question 5 5 pts
Which statement is true?
Group of answer choices
a.
The Sensitivity Analysis is not available if there is an integer constraint.
b.
There is no alternate optimal solution in this problem because the allowable increase of T is 1E+30.
c.
The Sensitivity Analysis is available even with an integer constraint.
d.
There is an alternate optimal solution in this problem.
Flag question: Question 6
Question 6 5 pts
If the unit price of the royal ruby friendship band increases to $1550
Group of answer choices
a.
The optimal solution will change and we have to resolve the problem to know the new optimal solution.
b.
The optimal solution will not change because the increase in profit is less than the allowable increase.
c.
The optimal solution will change because the increase in profit exceeds the allowable increase.
d.
The optimal solution will not change since we only change one parameter at a time.
Flag question: Question 7
Question 7 5 pts
What happened if the minimum number of Tiffany Diamonds Ring obligated to sell in the upcoming month is reduced from 25 to 20?
Group of answer choices
a.
Unless we resolve the problem, we don't know what is the new optimal solution and new optimal objective value.
b.
The new optimal objective value will change, the new value is 7812.5, and we need to resolve the problem to know the new optimal solution.
c.
The new optimal objective value will change, the new value is 8500, and we need to resolve the problem to know the new optimal solution.
d.
The new optimal objective value will change, the new value is 8500, and the optimal solution will not change.
Flag question: Question 8
Question 8 5 pts
By how much can the price of gold decrease without affecting the optimal solution?
Group of answer choices
a.
1.4535 cents
b.
1.5112 cents
c.
1.3533 cents
d.
1.7634 cents
Flag question: Question 9
Question 9 5 pts
Suppose Jack can produce a rainbow engagement ring that consists of 2 diamonds, 2 sapphire, 2 rubies, and 150 grains of gold.What is the minimum selling price at which this new ring would have to be priced in order for it to be included in the optimal product mix?
Group of answer choices
a.
1636.25
b.
1600.70
c.
1720.11
d.
can not tell, since decreases of two diamonds already exceed the allowable increase of 1.66
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started