Not-for-profit organizations have benefits for-profits do not, as they are formed to perform needed/beneficial services. Would you be in favor of limiting CEO (Chief Executive Officer) salaries as part of the requirements for being granted not-for-profit status? Explain the reasoning behind your opinion.

Also, use the internet to research a favorite non-profit of yours. (Don't forget a citation.) Provide a summary of their annual financial activities. How much revenue did they get, what percentage of that revenue went to the "cause", as opposed to other activities, such as advertising, salaries, etc. Did the numbers reflect your expectations, or were you surprised, pleasantly or unpleasantly?