NURSE MIDWIFERY ASSOCIATES, ET AL$.$ v$.$ B$.$K$.$ HIBBETT, M$.$D$.,$ ET AL$.$

Docket No$.82-3208$

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, NASHVILLE DIVISION

$689$ F$.$ Supp. $799$; $1988$ U$.$S$.$ Dist. LEXIS $9358$; $1988-1$ Trade Cas. $($CCH$)$ P$67,975$

March $14,1988,$ Decided

March $14,1988,$ Entered

JUDGES: $[**1]$ John T$.$ Nixon, United States District Judge.

OPINIONBY: NIXON

OPINION: $[*802]$ MEMORANDUM

JOHN T$.$ NIXON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate on July $31,1987,$ concerning motions for summary judgment filed by each of the defendants in this case. Plaintiffs and certain defendants have filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Under Rule $72($b$)$ of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court must make a de novo determination of all matters to which the parties object. In its determination, the Court may adopt, modify, or reject any of the Magistrate's proposed findings or recommendations.

B marketing,