O.J. Simpson was acquitted at his criminal trial for murder, but later found liable for wrongful death in a civil suit filed by his victims' families. Briefly explain why a jury, given the same set of facts, could still find Simpson liable in civil court even if he was acquitted in a criminal trial.

Which 20^th Century Supreme Court case vastly expanded the scope of the Interstate Commerce Clause,extending it to scenarios in which a law had a "substantial effect" on interstate commerce?

John, a New York man, works just across the border in New Jersey. John rear-ends Sheila, a New Jersey woman right as John is approaching his New Jersey office. Sheila sues John. Is it likely that a New Jersey State Court would have jurisdiction over John? Why or why not?