On April 10. Mel entered into a contract to sell his house to Nan at a price of $300 000, Title was to transfer May 31. Nan paid Mel a deposit of $20 000. A cause in the contract between them said: "If the buyer does not complete as specified, the seller can clect to keep the deposit as liquidated damages On April 30. Nan told Mel she could not complete the contract because she could not sell her own house Mel immediately entered into a contract to sell his house to Paul for $320 000. Nan insists that Mel return her deposit because he has suffered no damages. Will a court order Melto return her deposit