On Mary Jackson's second dav of work as a secretary for the Bay Area Bombers, a semi-professional roller derby team, signed a document that purported to compel arbitration of anv disputes that ve with the Bombers. In the document she signed, Ms Jackson agreed to comply at all limes with and be bound by the consiution and bylaws or the Nation one agreed (1) 10 utes to the NRDL Commissioner for a binding decision, (2) to comply with all decisions of the NRDL Commissioner and ho release negor bers and others from any related claims. Nowhere in the document did the Bombers agree to do or to refrain from doing anything. After several years of employment the bombers terminaled her employment and si Bombers sought to dismiss the law suit based on the above mentioned document she signed. Idow would a cour rule whetner a contractic comov wir med and on what legal reasoning would that holding be based?