On Mary Jackson's second day of work as a secretary for the Bay Area Bombers, a semi-professional roller derby team, she signed a document that purported to compel arbitration of any disputes that she might have with the Bombers. In the document she signed, Ms. Jackson agreed to comply at all times with and be bound by the constitution and bylaws of the National Roller Derby League (NRDL).She agreed (1) to refer all disputes to the NRDL Commissioner for a binding decision, (2) to comply with all decisions of the NRDL Commissioner, and (3) to release the Bombers and others from any related claims. Nowhere in the document did the Bombers agree to do or to refrain from doing anything.After several years of employment the Bombers terminated her employment and she filed suit in the District Court.The Bombers sought to dismiss the law suit based on the above mentioned document she signed.How would a court rule whether a contract to comply with that document had been formed and on what legal reasoning would that holding be based? Would your answer be any different whether or not she were terminated for cause?Please explain in detail whether it would or would not make any difference.