Question
On the 1st of January, David by three separate letters which he posted to Ann, Bev and Cathy informed them that he was selling his
On the 1st of January, David by three separate letters which he posted to Ann, Bev and Cathy informed them that he was selling his 2004 BMW car for $1M. He stated in the letter that the offer would remain open until the 8th of January. All three persons received the letters in the post on the following day. Ann on receiving the letter thought it was a good price. She immediately replied to David stating that she was interested in buying the car and that she wanted a BMW expert to give her his opinion on the car. On the 9th January, she posted a cheque for $1,000,000.00 to David. Immediately Bev received the letter, she telephoned David but he was not around to take the call, she left a message on his answering machine stating that in her opinion the car was overpriced and that she would pay $800,000 for it. Davids answering machine was faulty so he did not retrieve the message. Bev waited for Davids response and not wanting to lose the car left a second message on Davids answering machine that she had reconsidered her position and that she would buy the car for $1M. David retrieved both messages left by Bev on the 3rd of January. Cathy on receiving the letter responded by posting a letter to David on the 2nd of January stating that she was willing to buy the car at the stated price of $1M and thanking him for the offer. The letter posted by Cathy was delivered to David on the 7th of January. On the 4th of January, Cathy sent a fax to David asking him to ignore the letter she had posted on the 2nd . This fax was never received by David. Meanwhile on the 5th of January, David advertised the car for sale in the newspaper having been advised by a friend that he could get a much higher price for the car. David was visited by a couple who responded to the Ad. The couple introduced themselves as Mr. And Mrs. Chin, owners of a popular supermarket chain in Kingston. David thought that Mrs. Chin looked very young but he did not want to embarrass himself so he did not ask the couple to prove their identity. They gave David a cheque for $1.3M and drove away the car. On lodging the cheque, David discovered that there was no money in the account. H has also discovered that the couple he sold the car to was not Mr. and Mrs. Chin but Tricksters. The lady who is a 17 year old high school drop out and her 25 year old boyfriend have been defrauding businesses in Kingston. The car has been resold to a Utech lecturer for $500,000 and the boyfriend has absconded with the money leaving the girl behind. David has located the Utech lecturer and the girl. Ann, Bev and Cathy, who has changed her mind again and now wants the car. They are all claiming ownership of the car and they are insisting that David should recover the car from the Utech lecturer.
Advise David on all issues arising.
Step by Step Solution
3.31 Rating (142 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
To advise David on the issues arising from the scenario we need to consider several legal principles and analyze the actions of Ann Bev Cathy and the ...Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started