One morning, while Paul was driving to work, he realized he had left his smart phone at home on his desk. Since he was only two blocks from home, Paul decided to return to his home and retrieve his smart phone. Paul pulled into his driveway and ran into his house to retrieve the smart phone, leaving his keys in the ignition of the car and the car unlocked.

Doris, who was walking past as Paul entered his house, noticed that Paul had left his car unlocked. Doris decided to look into the car to see if there was anything of value tosteal, andnoticed that Paul had left the keys in the ignition, and a laptop computer on the passenger seat. Doris decided to steal the car, so she started the car and sped away. Doris failed to notice Paul's dog sleeping in the back seat. Paul heard the sound of his carstarting, andran out of the house just as Doris sped away. Paul called the police and reported the car stolen, together with his dog and his laptop computer.

Paul's dog found its way back home to Paul the next day, apparently unharmed by the ordeal. The police recovered Paul's car one week later undamaged, with only an additional 50 miles on the odometer, but Paul's laptop computer was never recovered.

What intentional tort causes of action can Paul reasonably assert against Doris, and what defenses, if any, can Doris raise? Discuss.