One night in late August, a group of teenagers gathered at one's family cottage on a summer resort lake for an "end of the summer" party. A number of the teenagers came to the party from cottages across the lake by driving the family speedboats. Amongst these were Sam and Tina in one boat and Gene in another. The party became so rowdy that Sam and Tina left in Sam's boat. Neither was intoxicated. They took the longest possible route, along the shoreline, to Tina's family's cottage. About a mile from the party site, Sam was showing Tina the Big Dipper when they suddenly smashed into Henry's private dock. Henry was sleeping in his boathouse that night to avoid his in-laws who had been visiting for 2 weeks and had overstayed their welcome. Almost immediately, Gene approached the dock, having taken the same route as Sam after leaving the party. Gene was highly intoxicated and, failing to understand or heed Tina's frantic warnings, plowed into Henry's already damaged boathouse. Henry was unconscious when removed from the wreckage by paramedics and died a week later. Does Henry's estate have a cause of action against Sam or Gene? Question 4 options: a) No, any cause of action is personal to Henry and is extinguished with his death. b) No, once Henry dies, the only cause of action lies with his heirs. c) Yes, Henry's estate will sue in wrongful death. d) Yes, Henry's cause of action survives to become an asset of his estate