Question
One of the torts covered in the course is nuisance. An Alberta case which involved both a claim in nuisance as well as negligence, is
One of the torts covered in the course is nuisance. An Alberta case which involved both a claim in nuisance as well as negligence, is Meadows v. Protoc, 2012 ABPC 360 ( CanLII). After reading this case, identify the statement below which is INCORRECT :
A. Occasional debris which fails from a tree onto a neighbour's property does not constitute a substantial or unreasonale interference with that property
B. The Court heard evidence, among other things, of calls to the police as well as calls and attendance by the by-law officer
C. The growing of the Defendants' tree is not a natural use of the Defendants' land and is an unreasonable use of the Defendants land
D. This case involves a dispute between neighbours relating to a tree and a fence.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started