One reason that a judge can deny or revoke a bankruptcy discharge is that the debtor lied about certain information in the bankruptcy process. However, does that apply even if the information that was lied about turned out to be irrelevant?

What if the creditors of the bankruptcy or the trustee want the discharge to be revoked because of Josh's lie?

Should the judge revoke the discharge because of the lie even though it would not have had any impact on the case?

Review and cite the following case and find relevant citations in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to support your argument.

Dale Alleman v. Brett J. Kitson, 341 Fed. Appx. 234 (7th Cir. 2009)