Our text (chapter 6) provides the case of State v. Ulvine as a way of further exploring the principals of actus reus in regards to accomplice liability. In this discussion you will be covering two things in your original post. First, I would like you to explain the basic principals behind the actus reus requirement for accomplice liability to attach. For the second part of your original response, you will be exploring the "contribution" aspect of the actus reus for accomplice liability by examining the case of State v. Ulvinen. A: Original Response - (due before Wednesday's 11 pm deadline): Refer to your text for this assignment Explain the basic principals behind the actus reus requirement for accomplice liability to attach. Explain whether or not you feel Helen Ulvinen's statement it would be best for the kids" should have sufficed as sufficient assistanc in the crime by way of encouragement. Be sure to include the rationale behind your conclusion