Pam runs a mail$-$order business for gym equipment. Annual demand for TricoFlexers is $\backslash (19\mathrm{.}500\backslash ).$ The annual holding cost per unit is $\backslash (\backslash$$ $1\mathrm{.}25\backslash ),$ and the cost to place an order is $\backslash (\backslash$$ $42\backslash ).$ a$.$ What is the economic order quantity? The EOQ is $($Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.$)$ b$.$ Suppose demand for TricoFlexers doubles, to $39,000.$ The EOQ for the new value of demand is $($Enter your response rounded to the nearest wholo number.$)$ Does the EOQ also double? A$.$ No$,$ the EOQ does not double as the annual demand doubles. The EOQ increases by the square$-$root of the product of two$-$times the demand times ordering cost, divided by holding cost. A Yas the FOD thuthles harause tha FOD is diraetlu nennortinnal in the demandThe EOQ for the new value of demand is $($Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.$)$ Does the EOQ also double? A$.$ No$,$ the EOQ does not double as the annual demand doubles. The EOQ increases by the sqtare$-$root of the product of two$-$times the demand times ordering cost, divided by holding cost. B$.$ Yes, the EOQ doubles because the EOQ is directly proportional to the demand. C$.$ No$,$ the EOQ does not double as the annual demand doubles. The EOQ is inversely proportional to the demand. D$.$ No$,$ the EOQ does not double as the annual demand doubles. The EOQ is inversely proportional to the square$-$root of the demand. c$.$ The manufacturer of TricoFlexers has agreed to offer Pam a price discount of $\backslash (\backslash$$ $2\backslash )$ per unit $(\backslash (\backslash$$ $40\backslash )$ rather than $\backslash (\backslash$$ $42)\backslash )$ if she buys $2,100.$ Assuming that annual demand is still $19,500,$ how many units should Pam order at a time? Pam should order units at a time. $($Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.$)$