paraphrase: A steward will refrain from supplanting or ceding collective norms for self-oriented norms. Thus, when the steward's and the proprietor's interests are disconnected, the steward accord high priority instead of disloyalty. Since the steward confirms collective norms as more beneficial and behaves congruously, his or her demeanor can be reasonably assessed (Davis et al., 1997). Stewardship theory expresses that the steward's collaborative bearing stems from the steward's aspiration to fulfill the institution's plans (e.g., increased membership and spirituality). Similarly, this norm will compensate principals like extrinsic owners (through profitable ROIs and cost allocations) and board members as the steward facilitates their objectives (Davis et al.,1997). Stewardship theory maintains that output discrepancies are centered around whether the institutional context in which the leader labors allows him or her to wield effectual actions. The issue becomes whether or not the institutional essence aids the leader in developing and completing plans for improved organizational performance (Donaldson & Davis, 1991)