Parker, the owner of certain unimproved real estate in Chicago,employed Adams, a real estate agent, to sell the property fora price of $250,000 or more and agreed to pay Adams a commission of 6 percent for making a sale. Adams negotiated withTurner, who was interested in the property and willing to pay asmuch as $280,000 for it. Adams made an agreement with Turnerthat if Adams could obtain Parker's signature to a contract to sellthe property to Turner for $250,000, Turner would pay Adams abonus of $10,000. Adams prepared and Parker and Turner signeda contract for the sale of the property to Turner for $250,000.Turner refuses to pay Adams the $10,000 as promised. Parkerrefuses to pay Adams the 6 percent commission. In an action byAdams against Parker and Turner, what is the judgment?

Summary of Case - tell me what the case is about in "your own" words." Be thorough.

Identify & explain the specific "rule of law" that applies to this case. Review the "homework aid" for this assignment first.

Explain how this specific "rule of law" applies to this particular case; use facts from the case and concepts from the related chapter

Use critical thinking skills to effectively detail the main points of this case leading to your conclusion.

Come to a final conclusion using "legal reasoning." (Come to "one" final conclusion. Do not speculate on the what if's; be decisive)