Question
PART 1 Based on Terry v Ohio (1968), answer the following questions? 1. What were the current and dissenting opinions in this case? 2. What
PART 1
Based on Terry v Ohio (1968), answer the following questions?
1. What were the current and dissenting opinions in this case?
2. What is your perspective on the outcome of this case?
PART 2:
1. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Case attrition refers to the number of arrests that result in no conviction or conviction resulting from reduced charges. Three reasons for a case attrition are:
- Insufficient evidence
Pro: dismissing weak cases ensures that innocent individuals are not wrongfully convicted. It upholds the principle of "innocent until proven guilty."
Con: if crucial evidence is overlooked, guilty parties may escape justice. Victims may feel let down if their cases are dropped due to insufficient evidence.
- Witness reluctance or intimidation
Pro: protecting witnesses is essential for maintaining trust in the legal system. Encouraging cooperation ensures accurate case outcomes.
Con: when witnesses refuse to testify, cases may collapse, and perpetrators may go unpunished. This undermines justice.
- Prosecutorial discretion
Pro: discretion allows efficient allocation of resources, focusing on serious crimes. It prevents overburdening the system.
Con: overreliance on discretion may lead to unequal treatment. Some cases may be dropped due to bias or political considerations.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started