Part 1: Find two examples of a specialization hierarchy in Crows Foot notation. The examples must:

Not be an example found in our book or course material (you may have to scan multiple chapters to ensure it is not from the book)

Represent a specialization hierarchy, not just notations and symbols

Be unique (i.e., do not provide variations of the same model)

Have at least four or more entities and several attributes

Include at least one with multiple levels of subtypes (like on page 173)

The examples do not have to be perfectyou will have the opportunity to explain incorrect components

For each example, you are to download the image file and name the files Heirarchy1 and Heirarchy2 while using the correct filename extension (e.g., Hierarchy1.jpg, Heirarchy2.png)do not change the filename extension from the original. Then, using the table below, provide the website location (not Google images, but the actual website where the image is located). You must submit both images along with this assignment.

File (2 pts ea.)	Website
Hierarchy1.jpg
Hierarchy2.jpg

Pick one of your examples above and thoroughly explain the ERD in the context of the seven subsections of Chapter 5.1.

Highlight the example you chose in the table above.

Discuss any errors they have in the diagram.

For each book subsection listed below

Write a short summary of the subsection that highlights the major points. It does not have to be in paragraph form, but it must use good spelling and grammar and be easily readable. (Do not copy and paste it from the book.)

Describe how the concepts in the subsection apply to your chosen example.

Describe how the concepts in the subsection do not apply to your chosen example.

Note: This assignment is a critical thinking analysis. You must read, summarize, and understand the material in the subsections, then analyze the diagram to find errors, what applies and why, and what does not apply and why. It must be in your own words, and use correct terminology and definitions. Discussing what applies, or does not apply, can vary in length depending on the diagramjust stating that it applies or does not apply is not good enough; you must explain.

Discuss any errors in the diagram:

Section 5-1a:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1b:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1c:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1d:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1e:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1f:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply:

Section 5-1g:

Summary:

Applies:

Does not apply: