Part 1: What is the importance of the Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureaucase, in regards to government agency functions and the importance of separation of powers?

Part 2: What was the final outcome of the "Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau"case?

Part 3: Are the legislative and executive functions of government agencies contemplated within the constitutional authority granted the executive and legislative branches? Why or why not?

Part2: Should the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau be left as is, disbanded, or restricted in a way that everyone may agree meets constitutional standards?