Part 2. Case Analysis (40%) On July 1, 2018 and July 5, 2018, Mr. Zhang, the plaintiff, purchased six bottles of SALVALAI red wine (name: Amaroni Vijue Red Wine 2010) and a total of 12 bottles of SALVALAI red wine at the defendant's ofce, and the plaintiff paid the defendant a total of 20,160 yuan by swiping his credit card. The plaintiff provided the video of the purchase process, which showed the whole process of the plaintiff entering the defendant's store, buying imported wine, the defendant picking up the goods, the plaintiff settling accounts and paying, the defendant issuing invoices to the plaintiff, the plaintiff carrying the wine out of the defendant's store and getting on the bus for inspection. In the video, the plainti took out the wine for inspection when buying wine from the defendant and after getting into the car, and rotated each wine bottle for 360 degrees to show that there were no Chinese labels on the wine bottles. in the trial, the plaintiff presented physical evidence of 12 bottles of wine involved in the case to the court, without Chinese labels and Chinese instructions. So, the plaintiff claim 10 times price compensation against defendant. The defendant submitted a number of court judgments before the court, that the plaintiff sued a number of different defendants at the same time in this court based on the same grounds that the products have no Chinese label, and required the defendants to refund the payment for goods and pay the compensation with ten times the price, the plaintiff in a number of cases submitted evidence form is almost the same. According to statistics, the number of cases is 50, and the amount of compensation involved amounted to more than 4 million yuan. Kyan are the judge facing this case, what would you (to ? To support Mr thang's claim or not ? Please make careful and reasonable analysis based on relevant chinese law