Part a) Independence considerations (15 mark) Smart Parking (Proprietary) Limited (Smart Parking) is a profitable owner-managed business. It provides long-term parking management services to office buildings and suburban shopping centres, and short-term parking management services for events such as conferences and trade shows in and around Johannesburg. The company has offices in Johannesburg.Simon Matebula formed Smart Parking in 2005. The company is run by Simon, who is the managing director. His wife, Rebecca, the financial director, handles the accounting and financial matters of the company. Together they own 30% of the shares. The remaining 70% of the shares are owned by Park Investments (Proprietary) Limited (Park Investments), an investment holding company formed in 2004. Simon and Rebecca also hold shares in Park Investments. Rebecca completed her training contract at BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors, a medium-sized practice, and qualified as a CA(SA) in 2010. BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors was appointed auditors of both Smart Parking and Park Investments on the formation of these companies. You are the senior responsible for both of these audits for the financial year ended 31 August 2017. The partner responsible for these engagements, Bennie Sekese, is a personal friend of Simon and Rebecca and handles both their personal and company tax matters. Rebecca insists that both audit and advisory services for Smart Parking are to be provided by BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors. Bennie Sekese is also currently advising the company in a PAYE dispute with SARS. Although Simon and Rebecca are very busy, they hold monthly meetings to review management accounts and budget deviations. Bennie Sekese often attends these monthly meetings as financial advisor to Smart Parking. REQUIRED: Discuss, with reasons, what threats to its independence your firm may face by continuing to perform the audit of Smart Parking, and what specific safeguards should be implemented to ensure that such threats are reduced to an acceptable level

(30 (15 QUESTION 2 MARKS) Part a) Independence considerations mark) Smart Parking (Proprietary) Limited (Smart Parking) is a profitable owner-managed business. It provides long-term parking management services to office buildings and Suburban shopping centres, and short-term parking management services for events such as conferences and trade shows in and around Johannesburg. The company has offices Johannesburg Page 16 of 23 Simon Matebula formed Smart Parking in 2005. The company is run by Simon, who is the managing director. His wife, Rebecca, the financial director, handles the accounting and financial matters of the company. Together they own 30% of the shares. The remaining 70% of the shares are owned by Park Investments (Proprietary) Limited (Park Investments), an investment holding company formed in 2004. Simon and Rebecca also hold shares Park Investments Rebecca completed her training contract at BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors, a medium-sized practice, and qualified as a CA(SA) in 2010. BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors was appointed auditors of both Smart Parking and Park Investments on the formation of these companies. You are the senior responsible for both of these audits for the financial year ended 31 August 2017. The partner responsible for these engagements, Bennie Sekese, is a personal friend of Simon and Rebecca and handles both their personal and company tax matters. Rebecca insists that both audit and advisory services for Smart Parking are to be provided by BST Inc. Registered Accountants and Auditors. Bennie Sekese is also currently advising the company in a PAYE dispute with SARS. Although Simon and Rebecca are very busy, they hold monthly meetings to review management accounts and budget deviations. Bennie Sekese often attends these monthly meetings as financial advisor to Smart Parking REQUIRED: Discuss, with reasons, what threats to its independence your firm may face by continuing to perform the audit of Smart Parking, and what specific safeguards should be implemented to ensure that such threats are reduced to an acceptable level. (15)