PART A (PROJECTS) (700-1100 words) - ( 35 marks) You have learnt the key characteristics of projects in Topic 1 of this unit. Part A requires you to apply this knowledge and any further research to a real project. A project has numerous characteristics that differentiate it from operations. Justify why the Sydney Light Rail Project is a project (see https://www.audit.now.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/CBD%20and%20South%20East%20Light%20Ra il O.pdf for projectinformation). Support your justifications with references to established definitions for what constitutes a project. (400-500 words) (15 marks) II. For the same project please explain (you will need to undertake additional research and examine additional sources in order to complete this section): a. The beneficial change this project will bring about by using the deliverable. Describing the deliverable(s) only will result in in low marks. (150-300 words) (10 marks) b. How the project links to the organisation's goals. (150-300 words) (10 marks)PART B (PROJECT PROCESSES (1200-1700 words) (65 marks) There is extensive literature on the different processes/knowledge areas that are required to complete a project. Assess the 10 Knowledge Areas within PMBOK 6" Edition in order to determine which three you think are the most critical to achieving project success. Describe why each of your selected areas are important to project success. You must have at least 3 references for each answer, not including PMBOK. Do not waste time defining or explaining how to perform the processes that belong to the Knowledge Area. The entire argument should be focused around why it is important in determining project success (900-1200words in total) (45 marks) II. Explain how the three chosen knowledge areas that you have selected could have been betterapplied in the case study from PartA. (500-800 words) (15 marks in total)80-100 Definition(s) for "project" is clearly established. Many direct connections made between chosen the project's characteristics and the definition(s) in order to establish the chosen project as a project. Connections are properly supported with references. No wasted language, argument is straight to the point. All reasonable benefits are clearly established and attributed to the correct stakeholders. The strategic goals of the organization are clearly identified. Direct ties showing how the project benefits contribute to the organizational goals. Relationship between deliverables, benefits, and strategic goals are clearly identified. Evidence provided is supported with references. Knowledge Area is clearly identified using consistent language to identify the Knowledge Area. A well thought out concise argument (supported by references) as to why that characteristic is Knowledge Area to a PM. Supporting references are carefully chosen to support argument as opposed to being used to meet a requirement forKnowledge Area is clearly identified using consistent language to identify the Knowledge Area. A well thought out concise argument (supported by references) as to why that characteristic is Knowledge Area to a PM. Supporting references are carefully chosen to support argument as opposed to being used to meet a requirement for Knowledge Area is clearly identified using consistent language to identify the Knowledge Area. A well thought out concise argument (supported by references) as to why that characteristic is Knowledge Area to a PM. Supporting references are carefully chosen to support argument as opposed to being used to meet a requirement for Three Knowledge Areas are applied to the scenario in a succinct manner. The benefits of each , as they pertain to the scenario, are clearly articulated. No space is wasted rephrasing the scenario. Writing is succinct and focuses strictly on how the three characteristics can be applied to the scenario to improve PM. Excellent grammar, punctuation, referencing, and flow of writing Ideas are clearly conveyed with no awkward phrasing or required re- reading in order to understand the idea. Publication ready level of writing