Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Part I Using the GSS from the years 2004 until 2010 and multinomial logistic regression, a researcher wanted to answer the following question: What determines

Part I Using the GSS from the years 2004 until 2010 and multinomial logistic regression, a researcher wanted to answer the following question: What determines which religion people will belong to? The options are: Protestant, Catholic, Jewish or no religion. (He excluded all other religions from the analysis.) As predictors, he includes: an index of the respondent's family's overall socioeconomic status (SES) when s/he was growing up, Pr SES, with a mean of approximately O and a standard deviation of about 0.8; whether the respondent was African-American or not, Black (yes=1, no=0); and whether the respondent's age is greater than 55 (Older=1) or not (Older=O). Just for your reference, a little more about Pr SES: The researcher wanted to make an index to capture a hypothesized latent variable of parental socioeconomic status (SES), so he calculated the Cronbach's alpha of three standardized variables: Father's education (Paeduc), mother's highest degree (Madeg), and the relative ranking of family income when the respondent was age 16 (Incom16). He gets a Chronach's alpha=0.668.

The output is in the following table.

1. Interpret both the logit and the relative risk ratio on Older for the category of "None" from Model 1 and Model 3 in Table 1; note statistical significance. What substantive conclusion do you draw from those coefficients?

2. The researcher hypothesized that because Protestantism was the dominant religion in the United States for the earlier part of the 20th century, and especially for the elites, that the older someone was and the more affluent there family was, the more likely they would be Protestant vs. being some other religion. Looking at the interactions in Model 2 in Table 1, does that theory find support? Speak to this in general and then also specifically by interpreting the relevant interactions and main effects.

3. There is a potential issue with interpreting interactions in the context of logit models, especially if we try to provide predicted probabilities or as odds-ratios or relative-risk ratios. Explain what the issue is of getting predicted probabilities or converting to odds-ratios or relative-risk ratios from interactions in logit models, like the multinomial one above.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Prealgebra

Authors: Elayn Martin Gay

7th edition

321955048, 978-0321955043

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions

Question

Why might some people be extremely capable at recognizing faces?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

How do the halves of the brain operate interdependently?

Answered: 1 week ago