Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Pat James, the purchasing agent for a local plant of the Oakden Electronics Division, was considering the possible purchase of a component from a new
Pat James, the purchasing agent for a local plant of the Oakden Electronics Division, was considering the possible purchase of a component from a new supplier. The components purchase price, $ compared favorably with the standard price of $ Given the quantity that would be purchased, Pat knew that the favorable price variance would help to offset an unfavorable variance for another component. By offsetting the unfavorable variance, his overall performance report would be impressive and good enough to help him qualify for the annual bonus. More importantly, a good performance rating this year would help him to secure a position at division headquarters at a significant salary increase.
Purchase of the part, however, presented Pat with a dilemma. Consistent with his past behavior, Pat made inquiries regarding the reliability of the new supplier and the parts quality. Reports were basically negative. The supplier had a reputation for making the first two or three deliveries on schedule but being unreliable from then on Worse, the part itself was of questionable quality. The number of defective units was only slightly higher than that for other suppliers, but the life of the component was less than what normal sources provided.
If the part were purchased, no problems with deliveries would surface for several months. The problem of shorter life would cause eventual customer dissatisfaction and perhaps some loss of sales, but the part would last at least months after the final product began to be used. If all went well, Pat expected to be at headquarters within months. He saw little personal risk associated with a decision to purchase the part from the new supplier. By the time any problems surfaced, they would belong to his successor. With this rationalization, Pat decided to purchase the component from the new supplier.
Required:
Do you agree with Pats decision? Why or why not? How important was Pats assessment of his personal risk in the decision? Should it be a factor?
Do you think that the use of standards and the practice of holding individuals accountable for their achievement played major roles in Pats decision?
Review the discussion on corporate ethical standards in Chapter Identify the standards that might apply to Pats situation. Should every company adopt a set of ethical standards that apply to its employees, regardless of their specialty?
The usefulness of standard costing has been challenged in recent years. Some claim that its use is an impediment to the objective of continuous improvement an objective that many feel is vital in todays competitive environment Write a short paper individually or in a small group with two or three other students that analyzes the role and value of standard costing in todays manufacturing environment. Address the following questions:
What are the major criticisms of standard costing?
Will standard costing disappear, or is there still a role for it in the new manufacturing environment? If so what is the role?
Given the criticisms, can you explain why its use continues to be so prevalent? Will this use eventually change?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started