Patrick brings a claim in federal court against Dominick for negligence over a car accident. Patrick presents evidence that Dominick ran through a stop sign and caused the accident. Dominick presents evidence that he did not and that Patrick ran a stop sign and caused the accident. Dominick had a passenger in his car that confirms Dominick's version of events. After all of the evidence is presented, both Patrick and Dominick move for judgment as a matter of law. The court should Question 2 options: a) Grant the motion for Dominick only since he presented additional evidence to support his claim and Patrick did not. b) Grant the motion for Patrick only. c) Deny the motions because a reasonable jury could decide for either Patrick or Dominick. d) Deny the motions because both parties cannot request judgment as a matter of law