Paulina has sued Diana for breach of contract (a state law claim) in Texas state district court. The parties have finished conducting discovery, and Paulina has produced admissible evidence in support of all of the elements of Paulina's claim. However, Diana has produced admissible evidence that contradicts Paulina's evidence on all elements of the claim. Both parties' evidence is credible when considered by itself, but Diana is confident that, once the jury hears all the evidence, the jury will find Diana's evidence to be more persuasive than Paulina's evidence. Diana files a motion for summary judgment asking the court to render judgment for Diana. Paulina files a response to Diana's motion arguing that the case should go forward. If the judge agrees with Diana that Diana's evidence is more persuasive than Paulina's evidence, the judge must grant Diana's motion and render judgment for Diana.

a) true

b)false