Payback Period Problems \#1 Use a 10% discounting rate to determine the DPBP Period Cash Flow Cumulative Cash Flow \begin{tabular}{rr|} \hline 0 & -50 \\ \hline 1 & 10 \\ \hline 2 & 13 \\ \hline 3 & 16 \\ \hline 4 & 19 \\ \hline 5 & 22 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \begin{tabular}{|l|r|} \#2 & Use a 10\% discounting rate to determine the DPBP \\ Period & Cash Flow Cumulative Cash Flow \\ \hline 0 & -50 \\ \hline 1 & 16 \\ \hline 2 & 16 \\ \hline 3 & 16 \\ \hline 4 & 16 \\ \hline 5 & 16 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \#3 Use a 10% discounting rate to determine the DPBP Period Cash Flow Cumulative Cash Flow \begin{tabular}{rr} \hline 0 & -100 \\ \hline 1 & 70 \\ \hline 2 & 50 \\ \hline 3 & 20 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Payback Period Using W1 and 122 address the following issue: Which of these two is preferable on the bash of Piscounted Payback Period? Why? With the Discounted cumilative Cash flow (NPV), you may change your preferences froen the anwer above. Why? Uiing 43 and 14 address the following bsues Which of these two is preferable on the basis of Discounted Payback Period? Why? The Cumulative Cash flow results are different between these two projects. Make the case why Oiscounted Payback Period is a useful tool here. Make the case why it is not