Pensacola Air Industries (PAI) manufactures aircraft parts for small aircraft. Over the past decade, PAIs management has met its goal of reducing its reliance on government contract work to 50 percent of total sales. Thus, PAIs sales are now roughly evenly split between government and commercial sales.

Traditionally, the costs of the Material-Handling Department have been allocated to direct material as a percentage of direct-material dollar value. This was adequate when the majority of the manufacturing was homogeneous and related to government contracts. Recently, however, government auditors have rejected some proposals, stating that the amount of Material-Handling Department costs allocated to these proposals is disproportionate to the total effort involved.

Kara Lindley, the newly hired cost-accounting manager, was asked by the manager of the Government Contracts Unit, Paul Anderson, to find a more equitable method of allocating Material-Handling Department costs to the user departments. Her review has revealed the following information.

	The majority of the direct-material purchases for government contracts are high-dollar, low-volume purchases, while commercial materials represent low-dollar, high-volume purchases.
	Administrative departments such as marketing, finance and administration, human resources, and maintenance also use the services of the Material-Handling Department on a limited basis but have never been charged in the past for material-handling costs.
	One purchasing manager with a direct phone line is assigned exclusively to purchasing high-dollar, low-volume material for government contracts at an annual salary of $54,000. Employee benefits are estimated to be 20 percent of the annual salary. The annual dedicated phone line costs are $4,200.

The components of the Material-Handling Departments budget for 20x4, as proposed by Lindleys predecessor, are as follows:

Payroll	$	270,000
Employee benefits		54,000
Telephone		57,000
Other utilities		33,000
Materials and supplies		9,000
Depreciation		9,000
Direct-material budget:
Government contracts		3,009,000
Commercial products		1,311,000

Lindley has estimated the number of purchase orders to be processed in 20x4 to be as follows:

Government contracts*	120,000
Commercial products	234,000
Marketing	2,700
Finance and administration	4,050
Human resources	750
Maintenance	1,500
Total	363,000

*Exclusive of high-dollar, low-volume materials.

Lindley recommended to Anderson that material-handling costs be allocated on a per purchase order basis. Anderson realizes that the company has been allocating to government contracts more material-handling costs than can be justified. However, the implication of Lindleys analysis could be a decrease in his units earnings and, consequently, a cut in his annual bonus. Anderson told Lindley to adjust her numbers and modify her recommendation so that the results will be more favorable to the Government Contracts Unit.

Being new in her position, Lindley is not sure how to proceed. She feels ambivalent about Andersons instructions and suspects his motivation. To complicate matters for Lindley, the companys new president has asked her to prepare a three-year forecast of the Government Contracts Units results, and she believes that the newly recommended allocation method would provide the most accurate data. However, this would put her in direct opposition to Andersons directives.

Lindley has assembled the following data to project the material-handling costs.

	The number of purchase orders increases 5 percent per year.
	The ratio of government purchase orders to total purchase orders remains at 33 percent.
	Total direct-material costs increase 2.5 percent per year.
	Material-handling costs remain the same percentage of direct-material costs.
	Direct government costs (payroll, employee benefits, and direct phone line) remain constant.
	In addition, she has assumed that government material in the future will be 70 percent of total material.

rev: 03_10_2014_QC_46408

Problem 5-56 Part 3

3.

Calculate the difference due to the change to the new method of allocating material-handling costs to government contracts.

4-a.	Calculate the net reduction in government contract material handling costs for 20x5 and 20x6. (Round your answers to the nearest whole number.)