Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Performance Attribution 1. How much of the manager's portfolio and how much of the benchmark portfolio is in cash? a. The managed portfolio is 60%

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

Performance Attribution 1. How much of the manager's portfolio and how much of the benchmark portfolio is in cash? a. The managed portfolio is 60% in cash and the benchmark is 30% in cash. b. The managed portfolio is 23% in cash and the benchmark is 10% in cash. c. The managed portfolio is 10% in cash and the benchmark is 5.81% in cash. 2. Does the manager appear to be bullish or bearish about the stock market? a. Bullish b. Bearish c. Neutral 3. Did the manager's overweight of the equities lead to positive or negative performance compared to the benchmark? a. Positive b. Negative 4. Did the manager's underweight of fixed income lead to positive or negative performance compared to the benchmark? a. Positive b. Negative 5. What was the return of the stock market during the period? a. 5.81% b. 1.45% c. .48% 6. When the manager overweighted stocks, how much extra return was produced by this asset allocation decision? a. .15.81%=.5810% b. .231.45%=.3345% c. .13.48=.0624% 7. In addition to the decision to allocate more of the portfolio to stocks, the manager decided that she didn't want to just invest in an index fund. She selected a portfolio of specific stocks that she felt would outperform the overall stock market. Did the manager's stock picking help the portfolio? a. No, the stock picking resulted in a lower return. b. Yes, the stock picking resulted in a higher return. 8. What was the stock market return for the portfolio? a. 1.89% b. 5.81% c. 7.28% 9. The manager's stock selection resulted in the stock portfolio having an excess return of 1.47%, but the stock selection didn't increase the overall portfolio return by 1.47%. Why? a. The portfolio was only 70% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 70%1.47% due to stock selection. b. The portfolio was only 7% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 7% x .44\% due to stock selection. c. The portfolio was only 23% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 23%0% due to stock selection. 10. How much portfolio return was added from the security selections in stocks and bonds? a. 1.06% b. 1.47% c. 1.91% Performance Attribution 1. How much of the manager's portfolio and how much of the benchmark portfolio is in cash? a. The managed portfolio is 60% in cash and the benchmark is 30% in cash. b. The managed portfolio is 23% in cash and the benchmark is 10% in cash. c. The managed portfolio is 10% in cash and the benchmark is 5.81% in cash. 2. Does the manager appear to be bullish or bearish about the stock market? a. Bullish b. Bearish c. Neutral 3. Did the manager's overweight of the equities lead to positive or negative performance compared to the benchmark? a. Positive b. Negative 4. Did the manager's underweight of fixed income lead to positive or negative performance compared to the benchmark? a. Positive b. Negative 5. What was the return of the stock market during the period? a. 5.81% b. 1.45% c. .48% 6. When the manager overweighted stocks, how much extra return was produced by this asset allocation decision? a. .15.81%=.5810% b. .231.45%=.3345% c. .13.48=.0624% 7. In addition to the decision to allocate more of the portfolio to stocks, the manager decided that she didn't want to just invest in an index fund. She selected a portfolio of specific stocks that she felt would outperform the overall stock market. Did the manager's stock picking help the portfolio? a. No, the stock picking resulted in a lower return. b. Yes, the stock picking resulted in a higher return. 8. What was the stock market return for the portfolio? a. 1.89% b. 5.81% c. 7.28% 9. The manager's stock selection resulted in the stock portfolio having an excess return of 1.47%, but the stock selection didn't increase the overall portfolio return by 1.47%. Why? a. The portfolio was only 70% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 70%1.47% due to stock selection. b. The portfolio was only 7% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 7% x .44\% due to stock selection. c. The portfolio was only 23% allocated to stocks, so the increase to the overall portfolio was 23%0% due to stock selection. 10. How much portfolio return was added from the security selections in stocks and bonds? a. 1.06% b. 1.47% c. 1.91%

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Analysis For Financial Management

Authors: Robert C. Higgins

12th International Edition

1260091910, 9781260091915

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What shorter and longer-term career goals spark your interest?

Answered: 1 week ago