Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Pete continued to look for a suitable space for his restaurant. He ran into one of his former professors, Jack Straw, who happened to own

Pete continued to look for a suitable space for his restaurant. He ran into one of his former professors, Jack Straw, who happened to own a great commercial property that would be ideal for the restaurant. After Straw informed Pete that the space was available for only $4,500 per month, Pete was tempted to take the offer. However, not wanting to make the same mistake twice, Pete asked Straw if he could have some time to think about it. Straw said "for all the work you did for me as a TA at only $5 per hour, I would be happy to keep the offer open for thirty days. Give me a call as soon as you decide." Two weeks later, Pete decided he wanted to take the space offered to him by Straw, but would only pay up to $4,000. He emailed Straw stating "I would like to accept your kind offer and will pay $4,000 per month." Two days later, after not hearing back from Straw and worried that he might lose the space, he emailed him again, stating "OK, fine, I will pay $4,500 for the space. When can we draw up the lease?" Straw called Pete moments later to tell him that he had already rented the space to someone else.

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
D Question 4 2.5 pts What is Straw's best argument that Pete did not properly accept Straw's offer? 0 No offer existed at the time of Pete's agreement to pay $4,500 because Pete had already rejected the offer. 0 Straw instructed Pete to call him to accept, and Pete emailed instead. 0 Pete lacked the legal capacity to accept the offer. 0 Straw had already revoked the offer by the time Pete agreed to pay $4,500. D Question 5 2.5 pts Did Straw have a separate contractual obligation to keep the offer open for a full 30 days? 0 No, the promise lacked consideration because Pete's work as a TA had occurred in the past. 0 No, because his promise to keep it open for 30 days was just puffery. 0 Yes, because Pete, in return for the promise to keep the offer open for 30 days, suffered a detriment in only earning $5 per hour as a TA. 0 Yes, because otherwise the situation would result in unjust enrichment of Straw. D Question 6 2.5 pts If Straw responded to Pete's second email by emailing back the following - "You can have the Space, but the rent is now $6,000 a month\" - does Pete have any claim against Straw? O No, because Straw's email is a new offer than Pete can either accept or reject. O Yes, based on the doctrine of unjust enrichment. O No, because Pete is an unsophisticated business person who doesn't understand commercial leasing. O Yes, because the parol evidence rule could be used to show that the original offer was $4,500 per month

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Fundamentals Of Lawyer Leadership

Authors: Leah W. Teague, Elizabeth M. Fraley, Stephen L. Rispoli

1st Edition

1543825257, 978-1543825251

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Answer question 1 and question 2

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

8. What values do you want others to associate you with?

Answered: 1 week ago