Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Peter Gowin was an employee of a granite countertop business owned by Joann Stathis.In November 2019, Gowin signed a promissory note agreeing to pay $12,500

Peter Gowin was an employee of a granite countertop business owned by Joann Stathis.In November 2019, Gowin signed a promissory note agreeing to pay $12,500 in order to become a co-owner of the business.The note was dated January 15, 2019 (ten months before it was signed), and required him to make installment payments starting in February 2019.Stathis told Gowin not to worry about the note and never requested any payments.Gowin continued to work at the business until 2021, when he quit, claiming that he owned half of the business.Stathis argued that Gowin was not a co-owner because he had never paid the $12,500 into the business.

  1. Argue in favor of Stathis that Gowin did not own any interest in the business.
  2. Gowin claimed that because compliance with the stated dates was impossible, the note effectively did not state a date for its payment. It therefore was a demand note under UCC 3-108(a).Because no demand for payment had been made, Gowin's obligation to pay had not arisen, and the termination of his ownership interest was improper.Is this a strong argument?Why or why not?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Essential Criminal Law

Authors: Matthew Lippman

3rd Edition

154435598X, 978-1544355986

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

1. How does a budget help control discretionary costs?

Answered: 1 week ago