Peter is given an A44(1) report citing the allegation of IRPA s.36(1)(b) for his conviction in the US that would be equivalent to a conviction in Canada under s.320.14(3) of the Canadian Criminal Code of Canada for Operation while impaired causing death.

1. What allegation will be included in the report for this conviction?
2. If the A44(1) report is well founded based on the initial review, what other options would you explain to Peter that may be available to him other than the hearing?
3. What would be the most likely outcome should Peter attend the hearing?
4. What advice would you offer Peter as his counsel to ensure he is will be able to visit Canada in the future