Peter sued David for damages suffered when a load of rebar fell off David's truck, directly in front of Peter, while he was driving on a highway. Peter charged that David was negligent in failing to secure the rebar on the truck. Peter calls Walt to testify that he was formerly employed as a truck driver and is an acquaintance of David. Walt further testifies that, immediately prior to the accident, he had coffee with David at a caf, and mentioned to David that the rope holding the rebar looked kind of loose.

Assuming proper objection by David's attorney, such testimony is:

Select one:

a.Admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule

b.Admissible nonhearsay

c.Inadmissible nonhearsay

d.Inadmissible opinion evidence